In the world of professional football, Jim Harbaugh has made a highly-anticipated return as the head coach of the Los Angeles Chargers. Yet, a cloud from his recent past at the University of Michigan continues to follow him. The NCAA's recent decision to hand down severe penalties, including a lengthy "show-cause" order, has prompted a major discussion: Why hasn't the NFL suspended its new head coach? The league's silence on the matter has created a fascinating debate that pits professional jurisdiction against a previously established precedent.
The NCAA's Ruling and a Sticking Point for the NFL
The NCAA Committee on Infractions recently concluded its lengthy investigation into the Michigan sign-stealing scandal. The final ruling included a ten-year show-cause penalty against Harbaugh, which, combined with a previous ruling, effectively bars him from returning to college football for more than a decade. The Committee's report painted a picture of a serious disregard for rules, stating they had "overwhelming" evidence of violations within the program under Harbaugh's leadership.
This is where the debate begins. Years ago, when former Ohio State coach Jim Tressel was disciplined by the NCAA, the NFL's commissioner, Roger Goodell, took the unprecedented step of honoring the NCAA's penalty, suspending Tressel for a portion of the NFL season. This action set a precedent, suggesting the NFL has the authority and willingness to enforce collegiate punishments.
The Case for a Suspension: A Matter of Precedent and Integrity
Those who argue the NFL should take action against Harbaugh point directly to the Tressel precedent. They believe that a failure to do so shows a lack of consistency and may even signal that the league has a double standard. The argument is that if the NFL is concerned with the integrity of the game, it cannot ignore such a severe penalty for conduct that involved what the NCAA called a "disregard for the rules." Allowing Harbaugh to coach without any repercussion, they contend, gives the impression that the NFL is picking and choosing when to enforce its own rules.
The Case Against a Suspension: Separate Leagues, Separate Rules
On the other side of the debate, the main argument is that the NFL and the NCAA are completely separate entities. The two leagues have no formal agreement to share jurisdiction or enforce each other's penalties. A suspension for Harbaugh, many believe, would be a major overstep by the NFL. The violations occurred under a different set of rules and a different governing body. The NFL has its own personal conduct policy, which does not explicitly cover violations that occurred in the college game. Additionally, a suspension of a head coach for a matter that did not occur within the league would be an unprecedented action that could set a dangerous precedent for the future.
The NFL's Silence and the Road Ahead
For now, the NFL's strategy appears to be one of calculated silence. The league has not made a public statement on the matter, which only adds fuel to the fire. It's a calculated decision that allows the league to avoid being drawn into the complex and often messy world of college athletics. While a public request from a prominent media personality to suspend Harbaugh has brought the issue to the forefront, the NFL's current inaction suggests it has no intention of getting involved.
Ultimately, whether you believe the NFL should suspend Jim Harbaugh or not, the debate highlights the ever-increasing blurring lines between college and professional sports.
NFL, Jim Harbaugh, Chargers
NFL News, Jim Harbaugh, Chargers, NCAA, Urban Meyer, Coaching